Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video169.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Kraft results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 188.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 169.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,505 of 28,364 speakers). This Robert Kraft is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Robert Kraft
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 169.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
14.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos169.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.1%28.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos