Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Kenton results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 64.1% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 298.033 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 43.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (10,908 of 27,740 speakers). This Robert Kenton is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Robert Kenton
Speaker details
Total words: 104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
43.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos104 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 64.1%64.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 45.6%45.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 42.2%42.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.4%24.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 64.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 42.2%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos