Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Martin results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 851 hits. Analysis detected 8,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,119 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,725 of 6,348 authors). This Matt Martin is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Matt Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
42%Matt Martin (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,119
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510041.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.5%10.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate