Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,058 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Martin results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 851 hits . Analysis detected 8,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,119 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,725 of 6,348 authors). This Matt Martin is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Matt Martin
Author details
Total words: 8,119
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst