Finding the 'holy ordinary' with environmental author Terry Tempest Williams 72%

By Katie Campbell0% Matt Martin0%

4/7/2026, 10:38:16 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 897 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.6% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,131 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the article peer group.

Terry Tempest Williams' work is not only notable for the way she captures the physical beauty of the natural world but also for how she invites the reader to deepen their spiritual understanding and connection to the environment. 
In her latest work, "The Glorians: Visitation from the Holy Ordinary," she seems to walk alongside the reader, trying to make sense of the obscure meaning of moments in her life, from the personal to the universal. 
Williams spoke with me about her work to capture what a dream dubbed the Glorians ahead of her tour stops in Washington. 
She'll be at Town Hall Seattle on Thursday, then she'll head out to Port Townsend for an event at Quimper Unitarian Universalist Fellowship on Friday. 
Glorians, Williams decided or maybe realized, are ordinary, often overlooked presences in the world. 
They can be physical beings, like the horned lizard "with eyes that can squirt blood as a carnal warning" or a cat so beautiful it needs at least three names (Sappho Cricket Jade) or the Harvard Divinity Tree. 
But as Williams discovered in her efforts to document the Glorians, she also learned they can be far less solid, like the grief she felt when Harvard cut down that tree, a 150-year-old rad oak, or the wonder when she learned its wood had been used by a great craftsman who wanted it returned to its home. 
I didn't grow up in the church, any church, but in "The Glorians," Williams captured the near-spiritual connection to nature that I was raised with. 
She observes nature in all its multitudinous glory, like she's observing a god. 
What matters to me is I am no longer surprised when the familiar becomes the unknown, the unexpected, the unrecognizable. 
I wait, I watch, and I listen. 
The world we are struggling to understand is moving faster than our comprehension. 
We need time. 
We need space. 
Change requires spaciousness if we are to integrate the past with the present with faith toward a future. 
This is not something to fear but to face, honor and embrace. 
THE GLORIANS (A SWEEP OF LIGHT) 
(Forgive the lack of a page number in my reference. 
I actually listened to the audiobook, which was narrated by Williams. 
I highly recommend it as it gives you that additional window into Williams, I think. 
Her soft, steady voice is simultaneously soothing and energizing, encouraging engagement with her ideas.) 
Williams' writing was disarmingly honest and open, human, and I was happy to find that was a genuine reflection of who she is as a person, not just a writer (the two can be quite different in some cases). 
"We're all looking for hope," she said. 
"I'll be honest, it's not a word I love [hope]. 
I think it's attached to our desires." 
Desires, perhaps, for a different outcome than what is before us. 
She wrote about her frustration with hope in "The Glorians," too. 
I want honest conversations that do not end on the obligatory hopeful note. 
We do not get to sing that song anymore. 
There is a real world, and it is dying. 
Death is becoming a haunting echo in an all too familiar territory. 
Our natural touchstones of joy will deliver us to heartbreak. 
Each of us will be forced to face the loss of the place that brought us to life. 
THE GLORIANS (THE WINGS OF HERONS) 
It's in passages like this when Williams' message becomes most powerful. 
There's an aggression, a righteous indignation in the words that feel amplified by her gentle delivery on the page and through her literal voice in the audiobook. 
She's not scolding, she's just being honest. 
And, honestly, she's afraid of the direction the world is going. 
"In many ways, the violence that we are seeing in our country is coming out sideways because we haven't grieved," she said. 
"We haven't grieved our history, whether it's enslaved people, whether it's the cultural genocide of Native people, and we have not grieved the deaths of over a million citizens in our country [because of COVID-19], many of whom are our loved ones, friends, family." 
In the book, she asked herself whether a lament can be a Glorian. 
The answer is yes, because "grief is love." 
There's a lot of grief in "The Glorians," reflecting as it does on the COVID-19 pandemic, on devastating wildfires in the summer of 2020, the loss of people and creatures close to Williams, and more. 
But the book also vibrates with life. 
I really could've used it back in 2020, to read about her desert documentations while making my own (I lived in Phoenix at the time). 
Now's as good a time as any, though, to think about the flora and the fauna she describes, and the immediacy of their being. 
"I've come to believe that there is something deeper than hope, and for me, that is engagement," she told me. 
"If we are present in this moment of radical change, we can engage in ways we didn't even imagine. 
The Glorians are inviting us to create a new way of being, to create a new way of seeing." 
Williams offered some examples of how to do exactly that in our conversation, which you can listen to above or by listening to KUOW's "Meet Me Here" wherever you gets your podcasts. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.7%Katie Campbell: 2.6%KUOW: 2.6%Confirmation Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.5%KUOW: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Katie Campbell: 3.0%KUOW: 3.4%Availability Heuristic10.1%This article: 4.1%Katie Campbell: 1.0%KUOW: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 2.8%Katie Campbell: 0.4%KUOW: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.8%KUOW: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Katie Campbell: 3.6%KUOW: 7.4%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 7.5%Katie Campbell: 1.1%KUOW: 1.0%Loss Aversion7.5%This article: 1.0%Katie Campbell: 0.5%KUOW: 1.0%Status Quo Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Katie Campbell: 2.9%KUOW: 3.8%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 6.1%Katie Campbell: 1.4%KUOW: 1.8%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 15.8%Katie Campbell: 4.9%KUOW: 8.0%Negativity Bias15.8%This article: 1.7%Katie Campbell: 1.3%KUOW: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias1.7%This article: 1.2%Katie Campbell: 0.4%KUOW: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error1.2%This article: 6.4%Katie Campbell: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 2.2%KUOW: 2.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.3%KUOW: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%Katie Campbell: 5.2%KUOW: 2.7%Halo Effect14.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Katie Campbell: 1.0%KUOW: 1.1%Recency Bias6.0%This article: 6.6%Katie Campbell: 0.4%KUOW: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.3%KUOW: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.6%Katie Campbell: 2.4%KUOW: 4.3%Appeal to Authority3.6%This article: 6.1%Katie Campbell: 1.4%KUOW: 1.4%False Dilemma6.1%This article: 1.0%Katie Campbell: 0.3%KUOW: 0.9%Slippery Slope1.0%This article: 0.9%Katie Campbell: 0.2%KUOW: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.9%This article: 14.9%Katie Campbell: 4.1%KUOW: 4.1%Hasty Generalization14.9%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.1%KUOW: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.8%Katie Campbell: 0.5%KUOW: 0.8%Bandwagon0.8%This article: 16.3%Katie Campbell: 5.6%KUOW: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion16.3%This article: 2.8%Katie Campbell: 0.4%KUOW: 0.8%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 8.8%Katie Campbell: 1.4%KUOW: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.4%KUOW: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.4%Katie Campbell: 0.3%KUOW: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.4%This article: 3.9%Katie Campbell: 0.2%KUOW: 0.2%Composition/Division3.9%This article: 11.6%Katie Campbell: 3.7%KUOW: 3.3%Anecdotal11.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.6%Katie Campbell: 0.8%KUOW: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.6%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.0%KUOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.1%KUOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.0%KUOW: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.1%KUOW: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Katie Campbell: 0.9%KUOW: 1.0%Unattributed Quote2.5%This article: 5.6%Katie Campbell: 0.5%KUOW: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection5.6%This article: 11.4%Katie Campbell: 7.4%KUOW: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice11.4%This article: 10.5%Katie Campbell: 3.3%KUOW: 1.5%Indoctrination10.5%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 1.1%KUOW: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie Campbell: 0.0%KUOW: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Katie Campbell: 5.8%KUOW: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…9.6%

897 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker16%attributed speech749writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 10 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTerry Tempest Williams • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
148 attributed words100% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.6 ptsWriter: 13.6%Terry Tempest Williams: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+2.8 ptsWriter: 10.0%Terry Tempest Williams: 12.8%12.8%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.5 ptsWriter: 11.5%Terry Tempest Williams: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.7 ptsWriter: 6.7%Terry Tempest Williams: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Terry Tempest Williams: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.