Speaker summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video69 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Shaw results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 184 faulty-reasoning hits from 69 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,731 of 28,364 speakers). This Rob Shaw is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Rob Shaw
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510065.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos69 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos