Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Hasen results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 93 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,617 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Hasen is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Richard Hasen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos