Speaker summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video170.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Hanania results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 138 faulty-reasoning hits from 170.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,354 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Hanania is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group.
Richard Hanania
Speaker details
Total words: 170.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751007.1% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos170.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos