Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Geyer results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 203.674 faulty-reasoning hits from 130 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,034 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard Geyer is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Richard Geyer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠37%Richard Geyer (selected)23%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 130
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos130 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.0%22.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.7%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos