Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Confirmation Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 17.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,719 of 28,364 speakers). This Richard is better (less manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Richard
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.0% percentile
17.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 38.3%38.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos