Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video38.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhun ap Iorweth results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 32.625 hits. Analysis detected 123.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 38.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,790 of 28,364 speakers). This Rhun ap Iorweth is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Rhun ap Iorweth
Speaker details
Total words: 38.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos38.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos