Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rewards for Justice results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Loss Aversion, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 48 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,605 of 28,364 speakers). This Rewards for Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Rewards for Justice
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Loss Aversion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.5%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos