Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video27 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican National Committee (RNC) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 81 faulty-reasoning hits from 27 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,586 of 28,364 speakers). This Republican National Committee (RNC) is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Republican National Committee (RNC)
Speaker details
Total words: 27
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos27 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos