Speaker summary
⁠65%3 analyzed articles/videos138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reid Hoffman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 187 faulty-reasoning hits from 138 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,489 of 28,364 speakers). This Reid Hoffman is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Reid Hoffman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 138
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos138 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.0%42.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos