Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video49 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reid Chunn results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 83.7% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 151.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 77.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (5,247 of 28,364 speakers). This Reid Chunn is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Reid Chunn
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
77.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos49 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 83.7%83.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 83.7%83.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 83.7%83.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 58.2%58.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%False Dilemma: Speaker 83.7%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 83.7%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 83.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 58.2%, sitewide 15.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos