Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regis Schultz results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 345 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,450 of 28,364 speakers). This Regis Schultz is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Regis Schultz
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
21.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 53.6%53.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 53.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos