Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reeves Wiedeman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,287 of 28,364 speakers). This Reeves Wiedeman is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Reeves Wiedeman
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos