Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 872 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Murphy results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 1,603 hits . Analysis detected 6,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,002 of 6,628 authors). This Tim Murphy is worse (more manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Tim Murphy
Author details
Total words: 3,488
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 46.0% 46.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.3% 11.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 46.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 11.4%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst