Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Zangen results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 64.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 328.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,514 of 28,364 speakers). This Rebecca Zangen is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Rebecca Zangen
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.4% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 64.2%64.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 42.6%42.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.8%6.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 64.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 42.6%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos