Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video65 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Reese results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 71.1% saturation with 46.234 hits. Analysis detected 147.441 faulty-reasoning hits from 65 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,058 of 28,364 speakers). This Rebecca Reese is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Rebecca Reese
Speaker details
Total words: 65
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
39.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos65 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 71.1%71.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 55.7%55.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 71.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos