Speaker summary
⁠51%4 analyzed articles/videos6,178.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Nagle results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,264.9 hits. Analysis detected 8,284.795 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,178.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,277 of 28,364 speakers). This Rebecca Nagle is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Rebecca Nagle
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos