Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video996 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lizzie O’Leary results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 761 hits. Analysis detected 4,684 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,958 of 6,360 authors). This Lizzie O’Leary is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Lizzie O’Leary
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
70%Lizzie O’Leary (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,984
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.1%15.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 11.2%11.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos