Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video82.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ray Reed results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 72.7% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 303.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,033 of 28,206 speakers). This Ray Reed is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Ray Reed
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 82.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 86.4%86.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 68.2%68.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 72.7%72.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.4%36.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 86.4%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 72.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 68.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos