Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video83.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ravindar Arora results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 78.1% saturation with 76.563 hits. Analysis detected 265.797 faulty-reasoning hits from 83.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,418 of 28,364 speakers). This Ravindar Arora is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Ravindar Arora
Speaker details
Total words: 83.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
31.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos83.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 78.1%78.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 58.4%58.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 16.3%16.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 78.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 58.4%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 6.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 0.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos