Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Johnson results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 126 hits . Analysis detected 1,370 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,920 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Sarah Johnson
Author details
Total words: 1,796
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Composition/Division: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst