Speaker summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 787.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Radheyan Simonpillai results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 207.407 hits . Analysis detected 1,518.306 faulty-reasoning hits from 787.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,694 of 26,730 speakers). This Radheyan Simonpillai is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Radheyan Simonpillai
Speaker details
Total words: 787.333
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.9% percentile 6.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos787.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst