Speaker summary
57%3 analyzed articles/videos787.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Radheyan Simonpillai results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 207.407 hits. Analysis detected 1,518.306 faulty-reasoning hits from 787.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,694 of 26,730 speakers). This Radheyan Simonpillai is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Radheyan Simonpillai
Speaker details
Total words: 787.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
6.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos787.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos