Speaker summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Zoe results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Hindsight Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 55.9% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 38 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,216 of 26,731 speakers). This Rachel Zoe is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Rachel Zoe
Speaker details
Total words: 51
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
55.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 55.9%55.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 55.9%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos