Speaker summary
⁠50%2 analyzed articles/videos174.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Kennedy results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Loss Aversion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.2% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 320 faulty-reasoning hits from 174.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,372 of 28,364 speakers). This Rachel Kennedy is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Rachel Kennedy
Speaker details
Total words: 174.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.2% percentile
17.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos174.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos