Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Cauley results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (3,515 of 28,364 speakers). This Rachel Cauley is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Rachel Cauley
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠88%Rachel Cauley (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510087.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos