Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Blake results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 100.875 hits. Analysis detected 379.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (20,903 of 28,364 speakers). This Rachel Blake is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
Rachel Blake
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 183
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.3% percentile
16.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos183 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.3%14.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 2.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos