Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Qiyang Xiong results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 65.1% saturation with 71.25 hits. Analysis detected 283.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,843 of 28,364 speakers). This Qiyang Xiong is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Qiyang Xiong
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 97.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
30.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos97.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 65.1%65.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 41.1%41.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.1%41.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 65.1%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos