Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video81.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pun Bandhu results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 111 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,852 of 28,364 speakers). This Pun Bandhu is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Pun Bandhu
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 81.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
53.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos81.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos