Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These public defender's office results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 86.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,952 of 28,364 speakers). This public defender's office is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group.
public defender's office
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠83%public defender's office (selected)87%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.5% percentile
86.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 72.4%72.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 72.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos