Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Primate Labs results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 286.873 faulty-reasoning hits from 267 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,742 of 28,364 speakers). This Primate Labs is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Primate Labs
Speaker details
Total words: 267
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.2% percentile
9.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos267 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos