Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prieto Fernandes results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 70.8% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 274.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,840 of 28,364 speakers). This Prieto Fernandes is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Prieto Fernandes
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.2% percentile
33.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 70.8%70.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 35.4%35.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 70.8%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos