Speaker summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These President’s House Coalition results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Bandwagon, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 309 faulty-reasoning hits from 122 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,210 of 28,364 speakers). This President’s House Coalition is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group.
President’s House Coalition
Speaker details
Total words: 122
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.1% percentile
50.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos122 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 63.9%63.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.1%36.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 63.9%, sitewide 15.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos