Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoeun Pen results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 270.966 faulty-reasoning hits from 242 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (24,899 of 26,730 speakers). This Phoeun Pen is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Phoeun Pen
Speaker details
Total words: 242
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos242 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 2.6%2.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos