Speaker summary
⁠60%2 analyzed articles/videos46.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoenix Project results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,551 of 28,364 speakers). This Phoenix Project is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Phoenix Project
Speaker details
Total words: 46.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
75.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos46.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.3%34.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos