Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phillip Norris results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 117.792 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,210 of 28,364 speakers). This Phillip Norris is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Phillip Norris
Speaker details
Total words: 105
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
16.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos105 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.7%18.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.0%24.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos