Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video55.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Zelikow results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 55.5 hits. Analysis detected 166.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 55.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,780 of 28,364 speakers). This Philip Zelikow is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Philip Zelikow
Speaker details
Total words: 55.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos55.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos