Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video14.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philip Hensher results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 12.375 hits. Analysis detected 24.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 14.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,548 of 28,364 speakers). This Philip Hensher is worse (more manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group.
Philip Hensher
Speaker details
Total words: 14.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.4% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos14.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos