Speaker summary
⁠90%1 analyzed article/video22 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Spencer results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Self-Serving Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 22 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (3,383 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Spencer is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group.
Phil Spencer
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 22
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

88% percentile
025507510088.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos22 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos