Speaker summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos421.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Lyman results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 121.577 hits. Analysis detected 1,021.378 faulty-reasoning hits from 421.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (24,960 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Lyman is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group.
Phil Lyman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 421.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.0% percentile
10.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos421.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.4%28.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 19.2%19.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos