KUER0%
How Celeste Maloy and Phil Lyman are trying to win over Utah’s biggest district 25%
By Sean Higgins0%
6/3/2026, 11:48:29 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 115 hits. Analysis detected 922 faulty-reasoning hits from 487 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 37.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (16,562 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the article peer group.
Utah's new 3rd Congressional District is big.
It’s not only the biggest district in the state by geographic size, but it's also the most economically diverse.
Spanning much of southern and eastern Utah, it includes communities from booming St.
George, to urban Provo, affluent Park City and large swaths of rural Utah.
That means there are some unique factors at play in the Republican primary between Rep.
Celeste Maloy and former state lawmaker Phil Lyman.
“The rural and urban dichotomy is so evident in this district,” she said.
“It is a microcosm of the entire state; it's almost like running for a statewide office to run for this congressional district.”
Maloy and Lyman fought a tight battle at April’s Utah GOP Nominating Convention, which saw Maloy emerge with a slim majority of support, but not enough to eliminate Lyman from contention.
To emerge victorious in the June 23 primary, Bennett said the candidates need to focus on the area’s feast-or-famine nature.
While St.
George and Cedar City are among the fastest-growing communities in Utah, and Park City is one of the highest-net-worth areas in the state, some of the district’s former mining communities in Carbon County and elsewhere have seen economic hardships and shrinking populations.
Both candidates zeroed in on rural issues like data centers and public lands in their lone debate.
They also paid special attention to affordability and economic growth in rural parts of the state.
For Maloy, the future is all about ensuring rural Utah doesn’t miss out.
“I have worked with the elected officials in those areas to make sure that we are investing in water infrastructure, in road infrastructure,” she said.
“Making sure that these rural communities that don't have the tax base … have the ability to keep up with the infrastructure needs that make it so that people can live there, to make it so people can move there, can invest there, start their small business there.”
Lyman took a more emotional approach.
He said rural Utahns are tired of seeing their money being spent in other parts of the state, singling out the upcoming 2034 Olympics and the downtown Salt Lake City sports and entertainment district.
“What [people in these communities] are feeling is treated poorly by those people who are making decisions that are divvying out the money,” he said.
“Those people in those communities, they're not dumb and they can see where the money is going.”
Bennett said that their differing approaches play to their unique strengths.
For Lyman, she said, his small-town, anti-establishment bona fides are his biggest selling point for many voters, while Maloy’s experience in Congress is her greatest asset.
In the end, Bennett thinks Maloy and Lyman occupy two different lanes in the Republican Party.
The question now is which wins out with the voters of the 3rd District.
Speakers
2speakers31%attributed speech338writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coveragePhil Lyman
76 attributed words51% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.