Keyword summary
0%10 analyzed articles/videos5,133 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rural Utah results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 2,054 hits. Analysis detected 21,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,202 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (33,075 of 35,675 keywords). This Rural Utah is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Rural Utah
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
8%Rural Utah (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate