Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video46 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil LeVota results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39.1% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 46 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,070 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil LeVota is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Phil LeVota
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 46
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
39.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos46 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 39.1%39.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.1%39.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 39.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos