Jackson County could return $250 million to property owners under tax assessment settlement 13%

By Frank Morris31%

7/24/2026, 9:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Loss Aversion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 424 faulty-reasoning hits from 429 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,183 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.60% of the article peer group.

Most residential property owners in Jackson County would receive tax credits under a proposed settlement announced Thursday. 
The county violated state law when it raised property taxes on many homeowners by more than 15% in 2023. 
Some taxpayers saw increases far above that threshold. 
Now, if the potential beneficiaries weigh in and a judge signs off on the settlement, Jackson County must pay back every bit of the money it overcharged in 2023 and 2024 to all the people who paid extra. 
Ken McClain, a partner in the firm Humphrey, Farrington and McClain, which sued the county, said about 207,000 taxpayers were affected and would be eligible for relief. 
The settlement includes former property owners and those who moved away or sold homes and stayed in the county, and would comprise all the money the county collected that was illegally gathered under state law. 
“The value of this is tremendous,” said McClain. 
“Never in the history of class actions that I'm aware of in something of this size do you have 100% refund.” 
The county will issue tax credits toward their next three years to current property owners, totaling the amount the county overcharged in 2023 and 2024. 
People who paid the higher taxes those years but have since sold their property in Jackson County will be able to apply for tax refunds. 
The settlement complies with a new county law and an executive order, as well as a memorandum of understanding passed unanimously Monday. 
Jackson County Executive Phil LeVota called the settlement a “major step forward” in a press conference Thursday morning. 
He had previously promised relief for Jackson County property owners. 
That was a reversal for Jackson County, which fought both the Missouri State Tax Commission and taxpayers in several lawsuits over the tax assessments and higher bills. 
The county’s resistance to lowering property taxes, even after being sued by the state tax commission to do so, contributed to a groundswell of anger targeted at then-County Executive Frank White, and helped lead to his recall last year. 
The settlement must face judicial review. 
The people eligible to be part of the class will receive notices and have a chance to object. 
“I don't know why someone would object if they understand it, because it's the full remedy that you could get under the law,” said McClain. 
The settlement also faces a challenge from the Independence and Fort Osage school districts, who argue the payments will force them to claw back spending they already budgeted. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.4%Frank Morris: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Confirmation Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Frank Morris: 1.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 3.5%Columbia Missourian: 5.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Frank Morris: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Loss Aversion8.9%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Frank Morris: 5.1%Columbia Missourian: 4.5%Optimism Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Frank Morris: 2.9%Columbia Missourian: 5.4%Negativity Bias6.5%This article: 4.2%Frank Morris: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 2.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.4%Halo Effect5.8%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Frank Morris: 1.9%Columbia Missourian: 0.9%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 3.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 3.9%Columbia Missourian: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.1%Frank Morris: 2.7%Columbia Missourian: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion6.1%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.1%Frank Morris: 2.8%Columbia Missourian: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.1%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 10.3%Frank Morris: 0.5%Columbia Missourian: 0.4%Burden of Proof10.3%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.3%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.4%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Frank Morris: 3.2%Columbia Missourian: 2.6%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.7%Frank Morris: 2.0%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.7%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.0%Columbia Missourian: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.8%Unattributed Quote1.9%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.7%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.5%Frank Morris: 2.4%Columbia Missourian: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 1.2%Columbia Missourian: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 6.5%Frank Morris: 2.1%Columbia Missourian: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.2%Columbia Missourian: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Frank Morris: 0.6%Columbia Missourian: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

429 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers23%attributed speech330writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageKen McClain • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageKen McClain • 8 words • 100.0% coverageKen McClain • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePhil LeVota • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKen McClain • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Phil LeVota

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words18% of attributed speech51% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-17.6 ptsWriter: 17.6%Phil LeVota: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-8.5 ptsWriter: 8.5%Phil LeVota: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.