Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video34.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Klotzbach results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,294 of 26,731 speakers). This Phil Klotzbach is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Phil Klotzbach
Speaker details
Total words: 34.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos