Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Desgranges results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,779 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil Desgranges is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Phil Desgranges
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.1% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos