Speaker summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video28.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Unattributed Quote, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 57 faulty-reasoning hits from 28.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (9,631 of 28,364 speakers). This Phil is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Phil
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 28.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos