Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video122.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phanombutr Chantrachot results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Burden of Proof, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 45.366 hits. Analysis detected 162.366 faulty-reasoning hits from 122.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,931 of 28,364 speakers). This Phanombutr Chantrachot is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Phanombutr Chantrachot
Speaker details
Total words: 122.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
29.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos122.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 27.5%27.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos